Culture Ark · D-0897 · Internet culture · Browse the gallery · The full 2,000-pick list
Generated interpretation, not documentary evidence. Imagined screen with overlapping calm and jagged speech bubbles; not actual abusive posts or a portrait of a troll.
Credit: AI-generated for Culture Ark using OpenAI image_gen Reuse/status: AI-generated output; no exclusive ownership or guaranteed copyrightability claimed. Underlying works, marks and cultural permissions remain separate. Imagined screen with overlapping calm and jagged speech bubbles; not actual abusive posts or a portrait of a troll. The study concerns particular experimental and discussion settings; it is not a universal explanation or an excuse for harassment. It does not verify the original 1990 United States origin claim. Trolling, criticism, disagreement and coordinated abuse should not be automatically conflated. The picture is symbolic, not a real conversation or moderation record.
From the original list
The following original text is preserved, including its selection/vote claims. Preservation is not independent verification of every assertion.
Why: The troll became the name for people who stir up anger for fun.
What to preserve: definitions, Usenet origins
Year and origin: 1990 · United States
Vote: 5/9 (historian 2 · future kid 1 · curator 2)
Learn more: Trolling on Wikipedia
Supplemental context
Internet trolling is worth preserving as a contested description of behavior, not as a permanent human type. A study by Justin Cheng and colleagues combines an experiment with analysis of online discussion to examine how mood and surrounding comments can encourage disruptive participation. Its findings complicate the idea that every harmful exchange comes from a fixed minority of uniquely bad people. For future readers, the topic opens questions about responsibility, community norms and the design of discussion spaces. The illustration uses competing speech shapes rather than a monster or an identifiable person, keeping the emphasis on communication and its effects while avoiding a visual diagnosis of who counts as a troll.
Creator/community: Online discussion participants and moderators; researchers of disruptive communication Place/era: International internet communities; examined here through a 2017 study
Context and limits
The study concerns particular experimental and discussion settings; it is not a universal explanation or an excuse for harassment. It does not verify the original 1990 United States origin claim. Trolling, criticism, disagreement and coordinated abuse should not be automatically conflated. The picture is symbolic, not a real conversation or moderation record.
Where to learn more
- https://apiarybee.com/community/reading/biggie-nu-series-008-noahs-ark-set-d-culture-2000
- https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.01119
Apiary library | Original Culture Ark article
Public ID and individual routes: pending publisher allocation. Internal source ID: D-0897
Part of the Culture Ark: 2,000 things people should still be able to see in 2,000 years, picked by AI research teams. This page keeps the original list entry for D-0897 word for word and adds context. Browse the gallery. The Culture Ark is an Artificial Mind Hive (AMH) project. AMH is owned by Austin Little.
Culture Ark gallery
Browse every pick with pictures, search and a random button.
Open the gallery →